Published 05/03/2022
Keywords
- mobility,
- counter-urbanisation,
- rural area,
- COVID-19,
- crisis
How to Cite
Copyright (c) 2021 Psychological Research (in the Balkans)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Abstract
The COVID-19 pandemic and the measures introduced to contain it have created a new social reality in which people continue their lives in ways that for many are different from the previous routine. Spatial mobility is one of the most affected areas of everyday life and an integral part of the sociocultural dimensions of this crisis. According to some observations, restricted movement during the state of emer gency in the country additionally activates these processes, prompting some people to seek more spatial freedom in rural areas.
This article observes and analyses the urban-rural migration within the context of the current corona virus crises, based on ethnographic materials, commented alongside information from secondary sources - statistics, sociological surveys, analysis of the real estate market, and materials from print and electronic media.
References
- Berry, B. (1976). The Counterurbanization Process: Urban America since 1970, Urban Affairs Annual Reviews, No. 11 (Urbanization and Counterurbanization), 17 – 30.
- Castles, S. (2010). Understanding Global Mi gration: A Social Transformation Perspective, Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, v. 36, No. 10, 1565 – 1586.
- Dahms, F. & J. McComb (1999). ’Coun terurbanization’, Interaction and Functional Change in a Rural Amenity Area – a Cana dian Example, Journal of Rural Studies, v. 15, No. 2, 129 – 146.
- Finnsson, P. T. (2020). Will Rural Living Become More Desirable Post-Corona?, Nordregio Magazine, No 3 (Post-pandemic re gional development), https://nordregio.org/nordregio-magazine/issues/post-pandemic-re gional-development/will-rural-living-become- more-desirable-post-corona.
- Malatzky, Ch. et al. (2020). Why Place Mat ters: A Rurally-Orientated Analysis of COV ID-19’s Differential Impacts, Social Sciences & Humanities Open, v. 2, No. 1, 100063, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2020.100063.
- Müller, D. (2007). Second Homes in the Nordic Countries: between Common Heritage and Ex clusive Commodity, Scandinavian Journal of Hospitality and Tourism, v. 7, No. 3, 193 – 201.
- Overvåg, K. (2009). Second Homes in East ern Norway. Doctoral Theses at NTNU 238, Norwegian University of Science and Tech nology: Trondheim.
- Quinn, B. (2004). Dwelling through Multiple places: a Case Study of Second Home Owner ship in Ireland. In Tourism, Mobility and Second Homes, eds. Hall Michael & Dieter Müller, 113–129. Channel View Publications: Clevedon.
- Rose, J. (2020). Time to Move? Data Suggests Americans May Flee to Rural Areas Post- COVID, Forbes, 06.08.2020, https://www.forbes.com/sites/jrose/2020/08/06/time-to-move-data-suggests-americans-may-flee-to-rural-areas-post-covid/?sh=9f2d65671612.
- Ross, H. (2020). Post-COVID-19 Wave of Regional Migration Predicted as People Seek Simpler Life, Get Back to Basics, ABC News, 10.05.2020, https://www.abc.net.au/news/2020-05-10/post-covid-19-pandemic-simpler-life-migration/12229082.
- Seraphin, H. & F. Dosquet (2020). Moun tain Tourism and Second Home Tourism as Post COVID-19 Lockdown Placebo?, World wide Hospitality and Tourism Themes, v. 12 No. 4, 485–500, https://doi.org/10.1108/WHATT-05-2020-0027.
- Sietchiping, R. et al. (2020). COVID-19 through the Lens of Urban Rural Linkages - Guiding Principles and Framework for Action (URLGP), UN-Habitat, https://unhabitat.org/sites/default/files/2020/07/issue_brief_cov id-19_through_the_lens_of_urban_rural_link ages_web_revised.pdf.