Vol. 23 No. 1 (2020)
Articles

Preconventional reading skills for 5-6 years old children from Bulgaria and Spain

Download PDF View Abstract
  • Katerina SHTEREVA,
  • Anelia IOTOVA

Published 06/10/2020

Keywords

  • Preconventional Reading,
  • Literacy,
  • Syllable Awareness,
  • Phonemic Awareness,
  • Written System

How to Cite

SHTEREVA, K., & IOTOVA, A. (2020). Preconventional reading skills for 5-6 years old children from Bulgaria and Spain. Psychological Research (in the Balkans), 23(1). Retrieved from https://journalofpsychology.org/index.php/1/article/view/64

Copyright (c) 2020 Psychological Research (in the Balkans)

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Abstract

The creation of the writing systems revolutionized the development of the human brain. Man learned to encrypt and decrypt information by utilizing additional symbols.

Preconventional reading and writing skills, which develop from birth to 5 years of age, have a strong connection with later conventional literacy. Six variables have prognostic value for literacy: Alphabet Knowledge; Phonological Awareness; Rapid Automatic Naming; Writing Awareness; Short-term Phono- logical Memory. Five early skills also correlate moderately: Concept of Writing; Writing Knowledge; Readiness To Read; Spoken Language; Visual Processing (National Reading Panel, 2000).

The aim of this study is to identify the gender and age differences during the formation of preconven- tional reading skills and the correlation between the different components in children with two different phonological and writing systems (Bulgarian and Spanish).

The methodology of the study includes the use of the PreLec test in Spanish, adapted for Bulgarian. It consists of 4 subtests: 1. Knowledge Of Written Material; 2. Syllabic Awareness; 3. Phonemic Awareness; 4. Awareness Of The Written System.
In this study, 150 children are examined in the age range between 56 and 72 months from Bulgaria and Spain.

Results: There are no statistically significant differences between the four subtests. For Bulgarian and Spanish children some differences are observed in subtest 4 (Awareness Of The Written System) with girls performing better.

No statistically significant age differences were found in three of the subtests (Knowledge Of The Written Material, Syllabic Awareness, Awareness Of The Written System). A statistically significant difference is only observed for Subtest 3 (Phonemic Awareness), most likely because at that age awareness of the phoneme level is still under improvement.

For Bulgarian and Spanish children Knowledge Of The Written Material is in a moderate connection with Syllabic Awareness. On the other hand, Syllabic Awareness for the two groups of children is moderately linked to Phonemic Awareness. An interesting fact is that we find some differences in Awareness Of The Written System: in Bulgarian children, it exhibits a significant correlation with the Phonemic Awareness, while for the Spanish children it is in moderate connection with Knowledge Of The Written Material.

Download PDF View Abstract

References

  1. Anbar, A. (1986). Reading acquisition of pre-school children without systematic instruction. Early Childhood Research Quarterly 1:69-83.
  2. Anderson, A., Stokes S. (1984). Social and institutional influences on the development and practice of literacy.Pp. 24-37 in Awakening to Literacy, H. Goelman, A. Oberg, and F. Smith, eds.Ports-mouth, NJ: Heinemann.
  3. Boyadzhiev, T., D. Tilkov. (1999): Бояджиев, Т., Д. Тилков. (1999). Фонетика. Великo Търново. [in Bulgarian - Phonetics.]
  4. Burns, M. S., Casbergue, R. (1992). Parent - child interaction in a letter-writing context. Journal of Reading Behavior 24(3):289-312.
  5. Bus, A. G., van IJzendoorn, M. H. (1997). Affective dimensions of mother-infant picturebook reading. Journal of School Psychology 35:1-14.
  6. Daskalova, F. (1994): Даскалова, Ф (1994). Методика на обучението по роден език в детската градина. Пловдив [in Bulgarian - Methodology of teaching native language in kindergarten. Plovdiv].
  7. López-Escribano C., .Ivanova A., Shtereva K. (2018). Rapid Automatized Naming (RAN) and Vocabulary are significant predictors of reading in consisting orthographies: A comparison of reading acquisition procedures in Bulgarian and Spanish; Electronic Journal of Research in Education Psychology, Vol. 16, Núm. 44 Http://Ojs. Ual.Es/Ojs/Index.Php/Ejrep/Issue/View/162.
  8. Ehri, L. C., Wilce, L. S. (1985). Movement into reading: Is the first stage of printed word learning visual or phonetic? Reading Research Quarterly, 20, 163-179.
  9. Gadsden, V. L. (1994). Designing and conducting family literacy programs that account for racial, ethnic, religious, and other cultural differences.Pp. 31-38 in Motivation: Theory and Re-search, H.F. O‘Neil Jr. and M. Drillings, eds. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum Associates.
  10. Ho CS, Bryant P. (1997). Phonological skills are important in learning to read Chinese, Developmental Psychology;33(6):946-51.
  11. Jackson, N. E. (1991). Precocious reading of English: Origin, structure and predictive significance. In ToBeYoung and Gifted, A. J. Tannenbaum and P. Klein, eds. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
  12. Wedel J., Fowler S. (1984). „Read Me a Story, Mom“: A Home-Tutoring Program to Teach Prereading Skills to Language-Delayed Children, Behavior Modification Behavior Modification.
  13. Liberman, I. Y., Shankweiler, D., Fischer, F. W. & Carter, B. (1974). Explicit syllable and phoneme segmentation in the young child. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 18, 201-212.
  14. Moll K., Suzanne E., Adriana G. (2011) To read or not to read: A meta-analysis of print exposure from infancy to early adulthood, Psychological Bulletin, Vol 137(2), 267-296.
  15. Moll K., Thompson P., Mikulajova M., Jagercikova Z., Kucharska A., Franke H., Hulme C., Snowling M. (2016). Precursors of Reading Difficulties in Czech and Slovak Children AtRisk of Dyslexia, Dyslexia.
  16. National Reading Panel (2000). Teaching children to read: An evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction. Rockville, MD: National Institute of Child Health and Human Development.
  17. Picard P. J. (2002). Chonological Awareness for Speech/Language Pathologists and their Educational Partners, Louisiana Department of Education.
  18. Seymour, P., Aro M., Erskine, J. (2003). Foundations literacy acquisition in European orthographies. British Journal of Psychology, 94, 143-174.
  19. Snow, C., Ninio A. (1986) The contracts of literacy: What children learn from learning to read books. Pp. 116-137 in Emergent Literacy:Writing and Reading, W. H. Tea le and
  20. E. Sulzby, eds. Norwood, NJ: Ab lex.
  21. Snow, C., Burns M. & Griffin, P. (1998). Preventing reading difficulties in young children. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
  22. Stoyanova, Yu. (2009): Стоянова, Ю. (2009). Езиково осъзнаване: ранна онтогенеза. сп. Българска реч, София, книга 3, 43–58. [in Bulgarian - Linguistic awareness: early ontogenesis. Bulgarian Speech Magazine, Sofia, Book 3, 43–58.].
  23. Sulzby, E., Kaderavek, J. (1996). Parent-child language during storybook reading and toy play contexts: Case studies of normally developing and specific language impaired (SLI) children. NationalReading Conference Yearbook 37:95-106.
  24. Sulzby, E., Teale, W. (1991). Emergent literacy. Pp. 727-757 in Handbook of Reading Research, Vol. 2, R. Barr, M. L. Kamil, P. Mosenthal, and P.D. Pearson, eds. New York: Longman.
  25. Sánchez S., Carretero L., Zarabozo Enríquez de Rivera, Daniel (2010). Prueba de Precursores de Lectura (PreLec) (manuscrito).
  26. Mol S., Bus A. (2011). To Read or Not to Read: A Meta-Analysis of Print Exposure From Infancy to Early Adulthood. Psychological Bulletin American Psychological Association 2011, Vol. 137, No. 2, 267–296 DOI: 10.1037/a0021890.
  27. Taylor, D., Dorsey-Gaines C. (1988). Growing Up Literate:Learning from Inner-City Families. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
  28. Teale W. (1986). Home background and young children‘s literacy development.In Emergent Literacy: Writing and Reading, W.H. Teale and E. Sulzby, eds. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
  29. Whitehurst G., Falco F., Lonigan C., Fischel J., DeBaryshe B., Valdez-Menchaca M., Caulfield M. (1988). Accelerating language development through picture book reading. Developmental Psychology 24:552-559.
  30. Yu X., Raney T., Perdue M., Zuk J., Ozernov-Palchik O., Becker B., Raschle N., Gaab N., (2018). Emergence of the neural network underlying phonological processing from the prereading to the emergent reading stage: A longitudinal study, Human brain mapping.