- theory of mind,
- family environment
How to Cite
Copyright (c) 2021 Psychological Research (in the Balkans)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The article presents research with Roma children from Bulgaria and the development of the Theory of Mind. In two studies (n = 60) with children aged 3 to 6 years, children were tested with tests for so-called False Belief Task. The first study was conducted with 30 rural children, and the second study was conducted with 30 urban children living in a large city (capital). In both groups the children are natural bilinguals, they do not attend kindergarten, and in both cases the Bulgarian language as a second language for them is learned at home.
In the first study, children were offered 4 tests for False belief, and in the second study, two tests for False belief and two language tests were offered. The aim of the author is to identify the factors that support the early acquisition of the Theory of Mind by Roma children and to experiment to what extent the knowledge of interrogative sentences with the mental verb to want and the grammatical category of evidentiality influence the development of the theory of mind in bilingual Roma children.
The results clearly show that Roma children who grow up in large Roma families in which 2-3 generations coexist acquire the Theory of Mind earlier (between 3-4 years of age) than English-speaking monolingual children who acquire the Theory of Mind between 4-5 years of age. The reason for this is that in large Roma families children hear different registers and everyone talks to the children with complex linguistic structures, which turn out to be very important for mastering the Theory of Mind. The results of the second study did not confirm the expectation that there was a statistically significant correlation between the interrogative sentences and the evidentiality and the tests for Theory of Mind.
- Astington, J. W. and Jenkins, J. M. (1999). A longitudinal study of the relation between lan guage and theory-of-mind development. Devel opmental Psychology, 35, 1311-1320.
- Astington, J. (1998). Theory of mind goes to school. Educational leadership, 56, pp. 46-48.
- Bakker, C. (1993). Foundations of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism. Clevedon: Multilin gual Matters.
- Bartsch, K. and Wellman, H. M. (1995). Chil dren talk about mind. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Bialystok, E. (2010). Experiences and the Mind: Psycholinguistic Implications of Bilingulaism. In: B. Bokus (ed.) Studies in the Psychology of Language and Communication. Warsaw: MA TRIX.
- Boroditsky, L. (2011) How Language Shapes Thought. The languages we speak affect our perceptions of the world. Scientific American, pp. 63-65.
- Jessner, U. (1995) How beneficial is bilingual ism? Cognitive aspects of bilingual proficiency. Grazer Linguistische Monographien, 10, 173- 182.
- Kyuchukov, H. (2010). Cognitive development and Theory of mind in bilingual children. In: B. Bokus (ed.) Studies in the Psychology of Lan guage and Communication. Warsaw: MATRIX.
- Meins, E et al. (2003). Pathways to understand ing mind: construct validity and predicative validity of maternal mind-mindedness. Child Development, 74, 1194-1211.
- Peal, E. and Lambert, W. (1962) The relation of bilingualism to intelligence. Psychological Monographs, 76, 1-23.
- Ruffman, T., Slade, L. and Crowe, E. The re lation between children’s and mothers’s mental state language and Theory-of-Mind Understand ing. Child Development, 73, 734-751.
- Spotakova, M. (2011). Cognitive Development and Theory of mind in socially disadvantaged Roma children. In: J. Stoyanova and H. Kyu chukov (eds.) Psychology & Linguistics. Sofia: Prosveta.
- Titone, R. (1995) Growing Bilingual-A re sponse from basic education. Grazer Linguist ische Monographien, 10, 389-399.
- Veraksa, A. (2019) “Teoriya soznaniya“ i sim volizaciya v doshkolnom vozraste [Theory of Minda and symbolization in preschool children]. Kulturno-istoricheskaya psihologiya, 7 (4), 9-16.